| PURSUANT TO SECTION 134(3)(P) OF THE COMPANIES ACT, 2013 AND REGULATION 17(10) & 25 OF THE SEBI (LODR) REGULATIONS, 2015, THE ANNUAL EVALUATION PROCESS FOR THE PERFORMANCE OF THE BOARD, ITS COMMITTEES AND INDIVIDUAL DIRECTORS ARE CARRIED OUT INTERNALLY. EACH BOARD MEMBER SUBMITTED A DETAILED EVALUATION FORM ON THE FUNCTIONING AND OVERALL LEVEL OF ENGAGEMENT OF THE BOARD AND ITS COMMITTEES ON PARAMETERS SUCH AS COMPOSITION, EXECUTION OF SPECIFIC DUTIES, QUALITY, QUANTITY AND TIMELINESS OF FLOW OF INFORMATION, DELIBERATIONS AT THE MEETING, INDEPENDENCE OF JUDGMENT, DECISION MAKING, MANAGEMENT ACTIONS ETC. ONE-ON-ONE MEETING OF THE INDIVIDUAL DIRECTORS WITH THE CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD WAS ALSO CONDUCTED AS A PART OF SELF-APPRAISAL AND PEER GROUP EVALUATION AND THE ENGAGEMENT AND IMPACT OF INDIVIDUAL DIRECTORS WAS REVIEWED ON PARAMETERS SUCH AS CONTRIBUTION, ATTENDANCE, DECISION MAKING, INTER-PERSONAL RELATIONSHIP, ACTIONS ORIENTED, EXTERNAL KNOWLEDGE, ETC. THE DIRECTORS WERE ALSO ASKED TO PROVIDE THEIR VALUABLE FEEDBACK AND SUGGESTIONS ON THE OVERALL FUNCTIONING OF THE BOARD AND ITS COMMITTEES AND THE AREAS OF IMPROVEMENT FOR A HIGHER DEGREE OF ENGAGEMENT WITH THE MANAGEMENT. THE INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS MET ON 07TH FEBRUARY 2025 TO REVIEW THE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF NON–INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS, BOARD INCLUDING THE CHAIRMAN, WHILE CONSIDERING THE VIEWS OF THE EXECUTIVE AND NON-EXECUTIVE DIRECTORS. THE INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS WERE SATISFIED WITH THE OVERALL FUNCTIONING OF THE BOARD, ITS VARIOUS COMMITTEES AND OTHER NON-EXECUTIVE AND EXECUTIVE DIRECTORS. THE BOARD EXPRESSED ITS SATISFACTION WITH THE EVALUATION RESULTS, WHICH REFLECTS THE HIGH DEGREE OF ENGAGEMENT OF THE BOARD AND ITS COMMITTEES WITH THE COMPANY AND ITS MANAGEMENT. |