| THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS CARRIED OUT AN ANNUAL EVALUATION OF THE BOARD ITSELF, ITS COMMITTEES AND INDIVIDUAL DIRECTORS. THE ENTIRE BOARD CARRIED OUT PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF EACH INDEPENDENT DIRECTOR EXCLUDING THE INDEPENDENT DIRECTOR BEING EVALUATED. THE NOMINATION REMUNERATION COMMITTEE ALSO CARRIED OUT EVALUATION OF EVERY DIRECTOR‘S PERFORMANCE. THE EVALUATION WAS DONE AFTER TAKING INTO CONSIDERATION INPUTS RECEIVED FROM THE DIRECTORS, SETTING OUT PARAMETERS OF EVALUATION. EVALUATION PARAMETERS OF THE BOARD AND COMMITTEES WERE MAINLY BASED ON DISCLOSURE OF INFORMATION, KEY FUNCTIONS OF THE BOARD AND COMMITTEES, RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE BOARD AND COMMITTEES, ETC. EVALUATION PARAMETERS OF INDIVIDUAL DIRECTORS INCLUDING THE CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD AND INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS WERE BASED ON KNOWLEDGE TO PERFORM THE ROLE, TIME AND LEVEL OF PARTICIPATION, PERFORMANCE OF DUTIES AND LEVEL OF OVERSIGHT AND PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT ETC. INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS IN THEIR SEPARATE MEETING EVALUATED THE PERFORMANCE OF NON-INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS, CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD AND THE BOARD AS A WHOLE. |
| PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF THE COMPANIES ACT, 2013 AND REGULATION 17(10) OF SEBI (LISTING OBLIGATION AND DISCLOSURE REQUIREMENTS) REGULATIONS, 2015 THE BOARD CARRIED OUT ANNUAL EVALUATION OF ITS OWN PERFORMANCE, PERFORMANCE OF ITS COMMITTEES AND EVALUATION OF INDIVIDUAL DIRECTOR INCLUDING INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS. THE INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS CARRIED OUT AN ANNUAL PERFORMANCE OF NON-INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS, THE BOARD AS A WHOLE AND CHAIRPERSON OF THE COMPANY. NOMINATION AND REMUNERATION COMMITTEE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS EVALUATED THE PERFORMANCE OF EVERY DIRECTOR. THE PERFORMANCE IS EVALUATED ON THE BASIS OF NUMBER OF BOARD AND COMMITTEE MEETINGS ATTENDED BY INDIVIDUAL DIRECTORS, PARTICIPATION OF DIRECTOR IN THE AFFAIRS OF THE COMPANY, DUTIES PERFORMED BY EACH DIRECTOR, TARGETS ARCHIVED BY THE COMPANY DURING THE YEAR. THE BOARD FOUND THE EVALUATION SATISFACTORY AND NO OBSERVATIONS WERE RAISED DURING THE SAID EVALUATION IN CURRENT YEAR AS WELL AS IN PREVIOUS YEAR. |
| THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS CARRIED OUT AN ANNUAL EVALUATION OF THE BOARD ITSELF, ITS COMMITTEES AND INDIVIDUAL DIRECTORS. THE ENTIRE BOARD CARRIED OUT PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF EACH INDEPENDENT DIRECTOR EXCLUDING THE INDEPENDENT DIRECTOR BEING EVALUATED. THE NOMINATION REMUNERATION COMMITTEE ALSO CARRIED OUT EVALUATION OF EVERY DIRECTOR’S PERFORMANCE. THE EVALUATION WAS DONE AFTER TAKING INTO CONSIDERATION INPUTS RECEIVED FROM THE DIRECTORS, SETTING OUT PARAMETERS OF EVALUATION. EVALUATION PARAMETERS OF THE BOARD AND COMMITTEES WERE MAINLY BASED ON DISCLOSURE OF INFORMATION, KEY FUNCTIONS OF THE BOARD AND COMMITTEES, RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE BOARD AND COMMITTEES, ETC. EVALUATION PARAMETERS OF INDIVIDUAL DIRECTORS INCLUDING THE CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD AND INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS WERE BASED ON KNOWLEDGE TO PERFORM THE ROLE, TIME AND LEVEL OF PARTICIPATION, PERFORMANCE OF DUTIES AND LEVEL OF OVERSIGHT AND PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT ETC. INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS IN THEIR SEPARATE MEETING EVALUATED THE PERFORMANCE OF NON-INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS, CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD AND THE BOARD AS A WHOLE. |
| THE BOARD EVALUATED THE EFFECTIVENESS OF ITS FUNCTIONING, OF THE COMMITTEES AND OF INDIVIDUAL DIRECTORS, PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF THE ACT AND THE SEBI LISTING REGULATIONS. THE BOARD SOUGHT THE FEEDBACK OF DIRECTORS ON VARIOUS PARAMETERS INCLUDING: DEGREE OF FULFILLMENT OF KEY RESPONSIBILITY TOWARDS STAKEHOLDERS (BY WAY OF MONITORING CORPORATE GOVERNANCE PRACTICES, PARTICIPATION IN THE LONG-TERM STRATEGIC PLANNING, ETC.); STRUCTURE, COMPOSITION AND ROLE CLARITY OF THE BOARD AND COMMITTEES EXTENT OF CO-ORDINATION AND COHESIVENESS BETWEEN THE BOARD AND ITS COMMITTEES EFFECTIVENESS OF THE DELIBERATIONS AND PROCESS MANAGEMENT; BOARD / COMMITTEES CULTURE AND DYNAMICS; AND QUALITY OF RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN BOARD MEMBERS AND THE MANAGEMENT. |
| THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS CARRIED OUT AN ANNUAL EVALUATION OF THE BOARD ITSELF, ITS COMMITTEES AND INDIVIDUAL DIRECTORS. THE ENTIRE BOARD CARRIED OUT PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF EACH INDEPENDENT DIRECTOR EXCLUDING THE INDEPENDENT DIRECTOR BEING EVALUATED. THE NOMINATION REMUNERATION COMMITTEE ALSO CARRIED OUT EVALUATION OF EVERY DIRECTOR’S PERFORMANCE. THE EVALUATION WAS DONE AFTER TAKING INTO CONSIDERATION INPUTS RECEIVED FROM THE DIRECTORS, SETTING OUT PARAMETERS OF EVALUATION. EVALUATION PARAMETERS OF THE BOARD AND COMMITTEES WERE MAINLY BASED ON DISCLOSURE OF INFORMATION, KEY FUNCTIONS OF THE BOARD AND COMMITTEES, RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE BOARD AND COMMITTEES, ETC. EVALUATION PARAMETERS OF INDIVIDUAL DIRECTORS INCLUDING THE CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD AND INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS WERE BASED ON KNOWLEDGE TO PERFORM THE ROLE, TIME AND LEVEL OF PARTICIPATION, PERFORMANCE OF DUTIES AND LEVEL OF OVERSIGHT AND PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT ETC. INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS IN THEIR SEPARATE MEETING EVALUATED THE PERFORMANCE OF NON-INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS, CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD AND THE BOARD AS A WHOLE. |