DURING THE YEAR, THE BOARD ADOPTED A FORMAL MECHANISM FOR EVALUATING ITS PERFORMANCE AS WELL AS THAT OF ITS COMMITTEES AND INDIVIDUAL DIRECTORS, INCLUDING THE CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD. THE EXERCISE WAS CARRIED OUT THROUGH A STRUCTURED EVALUATION PROCESS COVERING VARIOUS ASPECTS OF THE BOARDS FUNCTIONING SUCH AS COMPOSITION OF THE BOARD & COMMITTEES, EXPERIENCE & COMPETENCIES, PERFORMANCE OF SPECIFIC DUTIES & OBLIGATIONS, GOVERNANCE ISSUES ETC. SEPARATE EXERCISE WAS CARRIED OUT TO EVALUATE THE PERFORMANCE OF INDIVIDUAL DIRECTORS INCLUDING THE BOARD CHAIRMAN WHO WERE EVALUATED ON PARAMETERS SUCH AS ATTENDANCE, CONTRIBUTION AT THE MEETINGS AND OTHERWISE, INDEPENDENT JUDGMENT, SAFEGUARDING OF MINORITY SHAREHOLDERS INTEREST ETC. THE EVALUATION OF THE INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS WAS CARRIED OUT BY THE ENTIRE BOARD AND THAT OF THE CHAIRMAN AND THE NON-INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS WERE CARRIED OUT BY THE INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS THE DIRECTORS WERE SATISFIED WITH THE EVALUATION RESULTS, WHICH REFLECTED THE OVERALL ENGAGEMENT OF THE BOARD AND ITS COMMITTEES WITH THE COMPANY. |
DURING THE YEAR, THE BOARD ADOPTED A FORMAL MECHANISM FOR EVALUATING ITS PERFORMANCE AS WELL AS THAT OF ITS COMMITTEES AND INDIVIDUAL DIRECTORS, INCLUDING THE CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD. THE EXERCISE WAS CARRIED OUT THROUGH A STRUCTURED EVALUATION PROCESS COVERING VARIOUS ASPECTS OF THE BOARDS FUNCTIONING SUCH AS COMPOSITION OF THE BOARD & COMMITTEES, EXPERIENCE & COMPETENCIES, PERFORMANCE OF SPECIFIC DUTIES & OBLIGATIONS, GOVERNANCE ISSUES ETC. SEPARATE EXERCISE WAS CARRIED OUT TO EVALUATE THE PERFORMANCE OF INDIVIDUAL DIRECTORS INCLUDING THE BOARD CHAIRMAN WHO WERE EVALUATED ON PARAMETERS SUCH AS ATTENDANCE, CONTRIBUTION AT THE MEETINGS AND OTHERWISE, INDEPENDENT JUDGMENT, SAFEGUARDING OF MINORITY SHAREHOLDERS INTEREST ETC. THE EVALUATION OF THE INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS WAS CARRIED OUT BY THE ENTIRE BOARD AND THAT OF THE CHAIRMAN AND THE NON-INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS WERE CARRIED OUT BY THE INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS. THE DIRECTORS WERE SATISFIED WITH THE EVALUATION RESULTS, WHICH REFLECTED THE OVERALL ENGAGEMENT OF THE BOARD AND ITS COMMITTEES WITH THE COMPANY. |
DURING THE YEAR, THE BOARD ADOPTED A FORMAL MECHANISM FOR EVALUATING ITS PERFORMANCE AS WELL AS THAT OF ITS COMMITTEES AND INDIVIDUAL DIRECTORS, INCLUDING THE CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD. THE EXERCISE WAS CARRIED OUT THROUGH A STRUCTURED EVALUATION PROCESS COVERING VARIOUS ASPECTS OF THE BOARDS FUNCTIONING SUCH AS COMPOSITION OF THE BOARD & COMMITTEES, EXPERIENCE & COMPETENCIES, PERFORMANCE OF SPECI?C DUTIES & OBLIGATIONS, GOVERNANCE ISSUES ETC. SEPARATE EXERCISE WAS CARRIED OUT TO EVALUATE THE PERFORMANCE OF INDIVIDUAL DIRECTORS INCLUDING THE BOARD CHAIRMAN WHO WERE EVALUATED ON PARAMETERS SUCH AS ATTENDANCE, CONTRIBUTION AT THE MEETINGS AND OTHERWISE, INDEPENDENT JUDGMENT, SAFEGUARDING OF MINORITY SHAREHOLDERS INTEREST ETC. THE EVALUATION OF THE INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS WAS CARRIED OUT BY THE ENTIRE BOARD AND THAT OF THE CHAIRMAN AND THE NON-INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS WERE CARRIED OUT BY THE INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS. THE DIRECTORS WERE SATIS?ED WITH THE EVALUATION RESULTS, WHICH RE?ECTED THE OVERALL ENGAGEMENT OF THE BOARD AND ITS COMMITTEES WITH THE COMPANY. |
DURING THE YEAR, THE BOARD ADOPTED A FORMAL MECHANISM FOR EVALUATING ITS PERFORMANCE AS WELL AS THAT OF ITS COMMITTEES AND INDIVIDUAL DIRECTORS, INCLUDING THE CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD. THE EXERCISE WAS CARRIED OUT THROUGH A STRUCTURED EVALUATION PROCESS COVERING VARIOUS ASPECTS OF THE BOARDS FUNCTIONING SUCH AS COMPOSITION OF THE BOARD & COMMITTEES, EXPERIENCE & COMPETENCIES, PERFORMANCE OF SPECIFIC DUTIES & OBLIGATIONS, GOVERNANCE ISSUES ETC. SEPARATE EXERCISE WAS CARRIED OUT TO EVALUATE THE PERFORMANCE OF INDIVIDUAL DIRECTORS INCLUDING THE BOARD CHAIRMAN WHO WERE EVALUATED ON PARAMETERS SUCH AS ATTENDANCE, CONTRIBUTION AT THE MEETINGS AND OTHERWISE, INDEPENDENT JUDGMENT, SAFEGUARDING OF MINORITY SHAREHOLDERS INTEREST ETC. THE EVALUATION OF THE INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS WAS CARRIED OUT BY THE ENTIRE BOARD AND THAT OF THE CHAIRMAN AND THE NON-INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS WERE CARRIED OUT BY THE INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS. THE DIRECTORS WERE SATISFIED WITH THE EVALUATION RESULTS, WHICH REFLECTED THE OVERALL ENGAGEMENT OF THE BOARD AND ITS COMMITTEES WITH THE COMPANY. |
DURING THE YEAR, THE BOARD ADOPTED A FORMAL MECHANISM FOR EVALUATING ITS PERFORMANCE AS WELL AS THAT OF ITS COMMITTEES AND INDIVIDUAL DIRECTORS, INCLUDING THE CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD. THE EXERCISE WAS CARRIED OUT THROUGH A STRUCTURED EVALUATION PROCESS COVERING VARIOUS ASPECTS OF THE BOARDS FUNCTIONING SUCH AS COMPOSITION OF THE BOARD & COMMITTEES, EXPERIENCE & COMPETENCIES, PERFORMANCE OF SPECIFIC DUTIES & OBLIGATIONS, GOVERNANCE ISSUES ETC. SEPARATE EXERCISE WAS CARRIED OUT TO EVALUATE THE PERFORMANCE OF INDIVIDUAL DIRECTORS INCLUDING THE BOARD CHAIRMAN WHO WERE EVALUATED ON PARAMETERS SUCH AS ATTENDANCE, CONTRIBUTION AT THE MEETINGS AND OTHERWISE, INDEPENDENT JUDGMENT, SAFEGUARDING OF MINORITY SHAREHOLDERS INTEREST ETC. THE EVALUATION OF THE INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS WAS CARRIED OUT BY THE ENTIRE BOARD AND THAT OF THE CHAIRMAN AND THE NON-INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS WERE CARRIED OUT BY THE INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS. THE DIRECTORS WERE SATISFIED WITH THE EVALUATION RESULTS, WHICH REFLECTED THE OVERALL ENGAGEMENT OF THE BOARD AND ITS COMMITTEES WITH THE COMPANY. |
DURING THE YEAR, THE BOARD ADOPTED A FORMAL MECHANISM FOR EVALUATING ITS PERFORMANCE AS WELL AS THAT OF ITS COMMITTEES AND INDIVIDUAL DIRECTORS, INCLUDING THE CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD. THE EXERCISE WAS CARRIED OUT THROUGH A STRUCTURED EVALUATION PROCESS COVERING VARIOUS ASPECTS OF THE BOARDS FUNCTIONING SUCH AS COMPOSITION OF THE BOARD & COMMITTEES, EXPERIENCE & COMPETENCIES, PERFORMANCE OF SPECIFIC DUTIES & OBLIGATIONS, GOVERNANCE ISSUES ETC. SEPARATE EXERCISE WAS CARRIED OUT TO EVALUATE THE PERFORMANCE OF INDIVIDUAL DIRECTORS INCLUDING THE BOARD CHAIRMAN WHO WERE EVALUATED ON PARAMETERS SUCH AS ATTENDANCE, CONTRIBUTION AT THE MEETINGS AND OTHERWISE, INDEPENDENT JUDGMENT, SAFEGUARDING OF MINORITY SHAREHOLDERS INTEREST ETC. THE EVALUATION OF THE INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS WAS CARRIED OUT BY THE ENTIRE BOARD AND THAT OF THE CHAIRMAN AND THE NON-INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS WERE CARRIED OUT BY THE INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS THE DIRECTORS WERE SATISFIED WITH THE EVALUATION RESULTS, WHICH REFLECTED THE OVERALL ENGAGEMENT OF THE BOARD AND ITS COMMITTEES WITH THE COMPANY. |