| THE COMPANY’S BOARD EVALUATION POLICY AT ONESOURCE HAS BEEN DESIGNED IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE COMPANIES ACT, APPLICABLE SEBI (LISTING OBLIGATIONS AND DISCLOSURE REQUIREMENTS) REGULATIONS, THE GUIDANCE NOTE ON BOARD EVALUATION ISSUED BY THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA (SEBI) IN JANUARY 2017, AND THE SEBI MASTER CIRCULAR ON COMPLIANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF THE LISTING REGULATIONS BY LISTED ENTITIES, AS UPDATED ON JANUARY 30, 2026. THE NOMINATION AND REMUNERATION COMMITTEE (NRC) HAS ESTABLISHED A COMPREHENSIVE BOARD EVALUATION POLICY AND PRESCRIBED SPECIFIC CRITERIA FOR EVALUATING THE PERFORMANCE OF THE BOARD AS WHOLE, BOARD COMMITTEES, AND INDIVIDUAL DIRECTORS INCLUDING INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS. THE BOARD EVALUATION COVERS KEY AREAS INCLUDING BOARD COMPOSITION AND EFFECTIVENESS, STRATEGIC OVERSIGHT, GOVERNANCE, COMPLIANCE, STAKEHOLDER VALUE CREATION, INFORMATION MANAGEMENT, AND THE DISCHARGE OF RESPONSIBILITIES. BOARD COMMITTEES ARE EVALUATED ON THE ADEQUACY OF THEIR MANDATE, EFFICIENCY OF OVERSIGHT AND DECISION-MAKING, INDEPENDENCE, GOVERNANCE STANDARDS, AND COMPLIANCE PERFORMANCE. INDIVIDUAL DIRECTORS ARE ASSESSED ON THEIR STRATEGIC CONTRIBUTION, FUNCTIONAL EXPERTISE, LEADERSHIP, ETHICAL CONDUCT, PARTICIPATION, AND OVERALL PERFORMANCE IN BOARD DELIBERATIONS AND DECISION-MAKING. THE EVALUATION OF INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS IS CONDUCTED BY THE BOARD EXCLUDING THE DIRECTOR UNDER EVALUATION. IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE COMPANY’S BOARD EVALUATION POLICY, THE ANNUAL PERFORMANCE EVALUATION FOR FY26 WAS CONDUCTED ACROSS THE BOARD, ITS COMMITTEES, AND INDIVIDUAL DIRECTORS. THE EVALUATION WAS UNDERTAKEN THROUGH A STRUCTURED ONLINE QUESTIONNAIRE TAILORED TO EACH EVALUATION CATEGORY. THE ASSESSMENT ENCOMPASSED 112 QUALITATIVE AND QUANTITATIVE PARAMETERS AND INCORPORATED FEEDBACK BASED ON A PREDEFINED RATING FRAMEWORK, ENABLING A COMPREHENSIVE REVIEW OF FUNCTIONING, GOVERNANCE STANDARDS, AND CONTRIBUTION. THE EVALUATION EXERCISE WAS LED BY THE CHAIRPERSON OF THE BOARD, WHILE THE DESIGN AND OVERALL PROCESS OWNERSHIP RESTED WITH THE NRC. THE OUTCOMES AND RATINGS WERE REVIEWED AND DISCUSSED COLLECTIVELY BY THE BOARD AND INDIVIDUALLY WITH THE RESPECTIVE DIRECTORS TO IDENTIFY AREAS OF STRENGTH AND OPPORTUNITIES FOR CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT. THE KEY OBSERVATIONS AND ACTION POINTS ARISING FROM THE EVALUATION PROCESS WILL BE PERIODICALLY REVIEWED TO ENSURE SUSTAINED ENHANCEMENT OF BOARD EFFECTIVENESS AND GOVERNANCE STANDARDS. |