THE NOMINATION AND REMUNERATION COMMITTEE PURSUANT TO THE POWERS DELEGATED TO IT BY THE BOARD, HAS CARRIED OUT AN ANNUAL EVALUATION OF THE PERFORMANCE OF THE BOARD, THE DIRECTORS INDIVIDUALLY AS WELL AS THE EVALUATION OF THE FUNCTIONING OF VARIOUS COMMITTEES BASED ON THE CRITERIA FOR PERFORMANCE EVALUATION FORMINGPART OF THE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION POLICY OF THE COMPANY. FOR THE PURPOSE OF PROPER EVALUATION, THE DIRECTORS OF THE COMPANY HAVE BEEN DIVIDED INTO 3 (THREE) CATEGORIES I.E. INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS; NON-INDEPENDENT CHAIRMAN AND NON-INDEPENDENT NON- EXECUTIVE DIRECTORS; AND EXECUTIVE DIRECTORS.THE CRITERIA FOR EVALUATION INCLUDE FACTORS SUCH AS ENGAGEMENT, STRATEGIC PLANNING, VISION AND DIRECTION FOR GROWTH AND DEVELOPMENT, TEAM SPIRIT AND CONSENSUS BUILDING, EFFECTIVE LEADERSHIP, DOMAIN KNOWLEDGE, ENSURING BEST PRACTICES IN GOVERNANCE, FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT AND OPERATIONS, CONTRIBUTIONS TOWARDS ACHIEVING SHORT TERM AND LONG TERM GOALS OF THE COMPANY AND ROADMAP FOR ACHIEVING THEM, MANAGEMENT QUALITIES, TEAM WORK ABILITIES, RESULT/ACHIEVEMENTS, UNDERSTANDING AND AWARENESS, LEADERSHIP QUALITIES, MOTIVATION/COMMITMENT/DILIGENCE, INTEGRITY/ ETHICS/VALUES AND OPENNESS/ RECEPTIVITY. THE INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS OF THE COMPANY IN ITS SEPARATE MEETING HELD DURING THE YEAR REVIEWED THE PERFORMANCE OF NON- INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS AND BOARD AS A WHOLE AND CHAIRMAN OF THE COMPANY TAKING INTO ACCOUNT THE VIEWS OF EXECUTIVE DIRECTORS AND NON-EXECUTIVE DIRECTORS. FURTHER, THE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS OF THE COMPANY WAS DONE BY THE ENTIRE BOARD, EXCLUDING THE INDEPENDENT DIRECTOR BEING EVALUATED. |