ANNUAL PERFORMANCE EVALUATION WAS CARRIED OUT FOR ALL BOARD MEMBERS, FOR THE BOARD AND ITS COMMITTEES. THE BOARD EVALUATION FRAMEWORK HAS BEEN DESIGNED IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS UNDER THE COMPANIES ACT, 2013 AND THE LISTING REGULATIONS. THE SCHEDULE IV TO THE COMPANIES ACT, 2013 STATES THAT THE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS SHALL BE DONE BY THE ENTIRE BOARD OF DIRECTORS, EXCLUDING THE DIRECTOR BEING EVALUATED. THE BOARD EVALUATION WAS CARRIED OUT BASED ON RESPONSES RECEIVED FROM THE DIRECTORS ON QUESTIONNAIRE DESIGNED. THE PERFORMANCE OF THE BOARD WAS EVALUATED BY THE BOARD AFTER SEEKING INPUTS FROM ALL THE DIRECTORS ON THE BASIS OF THE CRITERIA SUCH AS THE BOARD COMPOSITION AND STRUCTURE, EFFECTIVENESS OF BOARD PROCESSES, INFORMATION AND FUNCTIONING, ETC. THE PERFORMANCE OF THE COMMITTEES WAS EVALUATED BY THE BOARD AFTER SEEKING INPUTS FROM THE COMMITTEE MEMBERS ON THE BASIS OF THE CRITERIA SUCH AS THE COMPOSITION OF COMMITTEES, EFFECTIVENESS OF COMMITTEE MEETINGS, ETC. THE CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD / THE NOMINATION AND REMUNERATION COMMITTEE (“NRC”) REVIEW THE PERFORMANCE OF THE INDIVIDUAL DIRECTORS ON THE BASIS OF THE CRITERIA APPROVED BY THE BOARD. IN A SEPARATE MEETING OF INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS HELD ON DECEMBER 19, 2019, PERFORMANCE OF NON-INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS, PERFORMANCE OF THE BOARD AS A WHOLE AND PERFORMANCE OF THE CHAIRMAN WAS EVALUATED. |
THE COMPANIES ACT, 2013 AND SEBI (LISTING OBLIGATIONS AND DISCLOSURE REQUIREMENTS) REGULATIONS, 2015 MANDATES EVALUATION OF PERFORMANCE OF INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS, NON- INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS AND CHAIRPERSON. THE COMPANIES ACT, 2013 STATES THAT A FORMAT ANNUAL EVALUATION NEEDS TO BE MADE BY THE BOARD OF ITS OWN PERFORMANCE AND THAT OF ITS COMMITTEES AND INDIVIDUAL DIRECTORS. SCHEDULE IV OF THE COMPANIES ACT, 2013 STATES THAT THE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS SHALL BE DONE BY THE ENTIRE BOARD OF DIRECTORS, EXCLUDING THE DIRECTOR BEING EVALUATED. THE PERFORMANCE OF THE BOARD WAS EVALUATED BY THE BOARD AFTER SEEKING INPUTS FROM ALL THE DIRECTORS ON THE BASIS OF THE CRITERIA SUCH AS THE BOARD COMPOSITION AND STRUCTURE, EFFECTIVENESS OF BOARD PROCESSES, INFORMATION AND FUNCTIONING, ETC. THE PERFORMANCE OF THE COMMITTEES WAS EVALUATED BY THE BOARD AFTER SEEKING INPUTS FROM THE COMMITTEE MEMBERS ON THE BASIS OF THE CRITERIA SUCH AS THE COMPOSITION OF COMMITTEES, EFFECTIVENESS OF COMMITTEE MEETINGS, ETC. THE BOARD AND THE NOMINATION AND REMUNERATION COMMITTEE (“NRC”) REVIEWED THE PERFORMANCE OF THE INDIVIDUAL DIRECTORS ON THE BASIS OF THE CRITERIA APPROVED BY THE BOARD. IN A SEPARATE MEETING OF INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS HELD ON 22ND DECEMBER, 2016, PERFORMANCE OF NON-INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS, PERFORMANCE OF THE BOARD AS A WHOLE AND PERFORMANCE OF THE CHAIRMAN WAS EVALUATED. FURTHER SEBI VIDE ITS GUIDANCE NOTE DATED JANUARY 5, 2017 HAS SUGGESTED PROCESS / PRACTISE THAT MAY BE ADOPTED BY THE COMPANIES FOR PERFORMANCE EVALUATION. THE COMPANY IS IN PROCESS OF EVALUATING THE REQUIRED CHANGES, IF ANY, IN PERFORMANCE EVALUATION PROCESS AS PER THE SEBI GUIDANCE NOTE. |
ANNUAL PERFORMANCE EVALUATION WAS CARRIED OUT FOR ALL BOARD MEMBERS, FOR THE FUNCTIONING OF THE BOARD AND ITS COMMITTEES. THE BOARD EVALUATION FRAMEWORK HAS BEEN DESIGNED IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS UNDER THE COMPANIES ACT, 2013. THE SCHEDULE IV TO THE COMPANIES ACT, 2013 STATES THAT THE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS SHALL BE DONE BY THE ENTIRE BOARD OF DIRECTORS, EXCLUDING THE DIRECTOR BEING EVALUATED. THE BOARD EVALUATION WAS CARRIED OUT BASED ON RESPONSES RECEIVED FROM THE DIRECTORS ON THE QUESTIONNAIRE DESIGNED. THE PERFORMANCE OF THE BOARD WAS EVALUATED BY THE BOARD AFTER SEEKING INPUTS FROM ALL THE DIRECTORS ON THE BASIS OF THE CRITERIA SUCH AS THE BOARD COMPOSITION AND STRUCTURE, EFFECTIVENESS OF BOARD PROCESSES, INFORMATION AND FUNCTIONING, ETC. THE PERFORMANCE OF THE COMMITTEES WAS EVALUATED BY THE BOARD AFTER SEEKING INPUTS FROM THE COMMITTEE MEMBERS ON THE BASIS OF THE CRITERIA SUCH AS THE COMPOSITION OF COMMITTEES, EFFECTIVENESS OF COMMITTEE MEETINGS, ETC. THE CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD / THE NOMINATION AND REMUNERATION COMMITTEE (“NRC”) REVIEW THE PERFORMANCE OF THE INDIVIDUAL DIRECTORS ON THE BASIS OF THE CRITERIA APPROVED BY THE BOARD AND INPUTS RECEIVED ON THE SAME. IN A SEPARATE MEETING OF INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS HELD ON DECEMBER 9, 2020, PERFORMANCE OF NON-INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS, PERFORMANCE OF THE BOARD AS A WHOLE AND PERFORMANCE OF THE CHAIRMAN WAS EVALUATED. |
THE COMPANIES ACT, 2013 AND SEBI (LISTING OBLIGATIONS AND DISCLOSURE REQUIREMENTS) REGULATIONS, 2015 MANDATES EVALUATION OF PERFORMANCE OF INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS, NON INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS AND CHAIRPERSON. THE COMPANIES ACT, 2013 STATES THAT A FORMAL ANNUAL EVALUATION NEEDS TO BE MADE BY THE BOARD OF ITS OWN PERFORMANCE AND THAT OF ITS COMMITTEES AND INDIVIDUAL DIRECTORS. THE SCHEDULE IV OF THE COMPANIES ACT, 2013 STATES THAT THE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS SHALL BE DONE BY THE ENTIRE BOARD OF DIRECTORS, EXCLUDING THE DIRECTOR BEING EVALUATED. THE PERFORMANCE OF THE BOARD WAS EVALUATED BY THE BOARD AFTER SEEKING INPUTS FROM ALL THE DIRECTORS ON THE BASIS OF THE CRITERIA SUCH AS THE BOARD COMPOSITION AND STRUCTURE, EFFECTIVENESS OF BOARD PROCESSES, INFORMATION AND FUNCTIONING, ETC. THE PERFORMANCE OF THE COMMITTEES WAS EVALUATED BY THE BOARD AFTER SEEKING INPUTS FROM THE COMMITTEE MEMBERS ON THE BASIS OF THE CRITERIA SUCH AS THE COMPOSITION OF COMMITTEES, EFFECTIVENESS OF COMMITTEE MEETINGS, ETC. THE CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD AND THE NOMINATION AND REMUNERATION COMMITTEE (“NRC”) REVIEWED THE PERFORMANCE OF THE INDIVIDUAL DIRECTORS ON THE BASIS OF THE CRITERIA APPROVED BY THE BOARD. IN A SEPARATE MEETING OF INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS HELD ON DECEMBER 21, 2017, PERFORMANCE OF NON-INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS, PERFORMANCE OF THE BOARD AS A WHOLE AND PERFORMANCE OF THE CHAIRMAN WAS EVALUATED. |
THE COMPANIES ACT, 2013 AND SEBI (LISTING OBLIGATIONS AND DISCLOSURE REQUIREMENTS) REGULATIONS, 2015 MANDATES EVALUATION OF PERFORMANCE OF INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS, NON INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS AND CHAIRPERSON. THE COMPANIES ACT, 2013 STATES THAT A FORMAL ANNUAL EVALUATION NEEDS TO BE MADE BY THE BOARD OF ITS OWN PERFORMANCE AND THAT OF ITS COMMITTEES AND INDIVIDUAL DIRECTORS. THE SCHEDULE IV OF THE COMPANIES ACT, 2013 STATES THAT THE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS SHALL BE DONE BY THE ENTIRE BOARD OF DIRECTORS, EXCLUDING THE DIRECTOR BEING EVALUATED. THE PERFORMANCE OF THE BOARD WAS EVALUATED BY THE BOARD AFTER SEEKING INPUTS FROM ALL THE DIRECTORS ON THE BASIS OF THE CRITERIA SUCH AS THE BOARD COMPOSITION AND STRUCTURE, EFFECTIVENESS OF BOARD PROCESSES, INFORMATION AND FUNCTIONING, ETC. THE PERFORMANCE OF THE COMMITTEES WAS EVALUATED BY THE BOARD AFTER SEEKING INPUTS FROM THE COMMITTEE MEMBERS ON THE BASIS OF THE CRITERIA SUCH AS THE COMPOSITION OF COMMITTEES, EFFECTIVENESS OF COMMITTEE MEETINGS, ETC. THE CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD AND THE NOMINATION AND REMUNERATION COMMITTEE (“NRC”) REVIEWED THE PERFORMANCE OF THE INDIVIDUAL DIRECTORS ON THE BASIS OF THE CRITERIA APPROVED BY THE BOARD. IN A SEPARATE MEETING OF INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS HELD ON DECEMBER 21, 2017, PERFORMANCE OF NON-INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS, PERFORMANCE OF THE BOARD AS A WHOLE AND PERFORMANCE OF THE CHAIRMAN WAS EVALUATED. |
THE COMPANIES ACT, 2013 AND SEBI (LISTING OBLIGATIONS AND DISCLOSURE REQUIREMENTS) REGULATIONS, 2015 MANDATES EVALUATION OF PERFORMANCE OF INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS, NON- INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS AND CHAIRPERSON. THE COMPANIES ACT, 2013 STATES THAT A FORMAL ANNUAL EVALUATION NEEDS TO BE MADE BY THE BOARD OF ITS OWN PERFORMANCE AND THAT OF ITS COMMITTEES AND INDIVIDUAL DIRECTORS. THE SCHEDULE IV TO THE COMPANIES ACT, 2013 STATES THAT THE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS SHALL BE DONE BY THE ENTIRE BOARD OF DIRECTORS, EXCLUDING THE DIRECTOR BEING EVALUATED. THE PERFORMANCE OF THE BOARD WAS EVALUATED BY THE BOARD AFTER SEEKING INPUTS FROM ALL THE DIRECTORS ON THE BASIS OF THE CRITERIA SUCH AS THE BOARD COMPOSITION AND STRUCTURE, EFFECTIVENESS OF BOARD PROCESSES, INFORMATION AND FUNCTIONING, ETC. THE PERFORMANCE OF THE COMMITTEES WAS EVALUATED BY THE BOARD AFTER SEEKING INPUTS FROM THE COMMITTEE MEMBERS ON THE BASIS OF THE CRITERIA SUCH AS THE COMPOSITION OF COMMITTEES, EFFECTIVENESS OF COMMITTEE MEETINGS, ETC. THE CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD / THE NOMINATION AND REMUNERATION COMMITTEE (“NRC”) REVIEW THE PERFORMANCE OF THE INDIVIDUAL DIRECTORS ON THE BASIS OF THE CRITERIA APPROVED BY THE BOARD. IN A SEPARATE MEETING OF INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS HELD ON DECEMBER 20, 2018, PERFORMANCE OF NON-INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS, PERFORMANCE OF THE BOARD AS A WHOLE AND PERFORMANCE OF THE CHAIRMAN WAS EVALUATED. |
THE COMPANIES ACT, 2013 AND SEBI (LISTING OBLIGATIONS AND DISCLOSURE REQUIREMENTS) REGULATIONS, 2015 MANDATES EVALUATION OF PERFORMANCE OF INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS, NON- INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS AND CHAIRPERSON. THE COMPANIES ACT, 2013 STATES THAT A FORMAT ANNUAL EVALUATION NEEDS TO BE MADE BY THE BOARD OF ITS OWN PERFORMANCE AND THAT OF ITS COMMITTEES AND INDIVIDUAL DIRECTORS. SCHEDULE IV OF THE COMPANIES ACT, 2013 STATES THAT THE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS SHALL BE DONE BY THE ENTIRE BOARD OF DIRECTORS, EXCLUDING THE DIRECTOR BEING EVALUATED. THE PERFORMANCE OF THE BOARD WAS EVALUATED BY THE BOARD AFTER SEEKING INPUTS FROM ALL THE DIRECTORS ON THE BASIS OF THE CRITERIA SUCH AS THE BOARD COMPOSITION AND STRUCTURE, EFFECTIVENESS OF BOARD PROCESSES, INFORMATION AND FUNCTIONING, ETC. THE PERFORMANCE OF THE COMMITTEES WAS EVALUATED BY THE BOARD AFTER SEEKING INPUTS FROM THE COMMITTEE MEMBERS ON THE BASIS OF THE CRITERIA SUCH AS THE COMPOSITION OF COMMITTEES, EFFECTIVENESS OF COMMITTEE MEETINGS, ETC. THE BOARD AND THE NOMINATION AND REMUNERATION COMMITTEE (“NRC”) REVIEWED THE PERFORMANCE OF THE INDIVIDUAL DIRECTORS ON THE BASIS OF THE CRITERIA APPROVED BY THE BOARD. IN A SEPARATE MEETING OF INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS HELD ON 22ND DECEMBER, 2016, PERFORMANCE OF NON-INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS, PERFORMANCE OF THE BOARD AS A WHOLE AND PERFORMANCE OF THE CHAIRMAN WAS EVALUATED. FURTHER SEBI VIDE ITS GUIDANCE NOTE DATED JANUARY 5, 2017 HAS SUGGESTED PROCESS / PRACTISE THAT MAY BE ADOPTED BY THE COMPANIES FOR PERFORMANCE EVALUATION. THE COMPANY IS IN PROCESS OF EVALUATING THE REQUIRED CHANGES, IF ANY, IN PERFORMANCE EVALUATION PROCESS AS PER THE SEBI GUIDANCE NOTE. |