PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF THE COMPANIES ACT, 2013 AND LISTING REGULATIONS, THE BOARD HAS CARRIED OUT AN ANNUAL PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF ITS OWN PERFORMANCE, THE DIRECTORS INDIVIDUALLY AS WELL AS THE EVALUATION OF THE WORKING OF ITS AUDIT COMMITTEE, NOMINATION AND REMUNERATION COMMITTEE. THE EVALUATION PROCESS COVERED THE ASPECTS WHICH INCLUDED BOARD STRUCTURE AND COMPOSITION, FREQUENCY OF BOARD MEETINGS, PARTICIPATION IN THE LONG TERM STRATEGIC PLANNING, CONTRIBUTION TO AND MONITORING OF CORPORATE GOVERNANCE PRACTICES AND THE FULFILMENT OF DIRECTORS’ OBLIGATION AND FIDUCIARY RESPONSIBILITIES, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ACTIVE PARTICIPATION AT THE BOARD AND COMMITTEE MEETINGS. THIS EVALUATION IS LED BY THE CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD GOVERNANCE, NOMINATION AND REMUNERATION COMMITTEE WITH SPECIFIC FOCUS ON THE PERFORMANCE AND EFFECTIVE FUNCTIONING OF THE BOARD. THE RESULT OF THE EVALUATION IS SATISFACTORY AND ADEQUATE AND MEETS THE REQUIREMENT OF THE COMPANY. |
PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF THE COMPANIES ACT, 2013 AND LISTING REGULATIONS, THE BOARD HAS CARRIED OUT AN ANNUAL PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF ITS OWN PERFORMANCE, THE DIRECTORS INDIVIDUALLY AS WELL AS THE EVALUATION OF THE WORKING OF ITS AUDIT COMMITTEE, NOMINATION AND REMUNERATION COMMITTEE. THE EVALUATION PROCESS COVERED THE ASPECTS WHICH INCLUDED BOARD STRUCTURE AND COMPOSITION, FREQUENCY OF BOARD MEETINGS, PARTICIPATION IN THE LONG TERM STRATEGIC PLANNING, CONTRIBUTION TO AND MONITORING OF CORPORATE GOVERNANCE PRACTICES AND THE FULFILMENT OF DIRECTORS’ OBLIGATION AND FIDUCIARY RESPONSIBILITIES, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ACTIVE PARTICIPATION AT THE BOARD AND COMMITTEE MEETINGS. THIS EVALUATION IS LED BY THE CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD GOVERNANCE, NOMINATION AND REMUNERATION COMMITTEE WITH SPECIFIC FOCUS ON THE PERFORMANCE AND EFFECTIVE FUNCTIONING OF THE BOARD. THE RESULT OF THE EVALUATION IS SATISFACTORY AND ADEQUATE AND MEETS THE REQUIREMENT OF THE COMPANY. |
PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF THE COMPANIES ACT, 2013 AND LISTING REGULATIONS, THE BOARD HAS CARRIED OUT AN ANNUAL PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF ITS OWN PERFORMANCE, THE DIRECTORS INDIVIDUALLY AS WELL AS THE EVALUATION OF THE WORKING OF ITS AUDIT COMMITTEE, NOMINATION AND REMUNERATION COMMITTEE. THE EVALUATION PROCESS COVERED THE ASPECTS WHICH INCLUDED BOARD STRUCTURE AND COMPOSITION , FREQUENCY OF BOARD MEETINGS, PARTICIPATION IN THE LONG TERM STRATEGIC PLANNING , CONTRIBUTION TO AND MONITORING OF CORPORATE GOVERNANCE PRACTICES AND THE FULFILMENT OF DIRECTORS’ OBLIGATION AND FIDUCIARY RESPONSIBILITIES , INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ACTIVE PARTICIPATION AT THE BOARD AND COMMITTEE MEETINGS. THIS EVALUATION IS LED BY THE CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD GOVERNANCE, NOMINATION AND REMUNERATION COMMITTEE WITH SPECIFIC FOCUS ON THE PERFORMANCE AND EFFECTIVE FUNCTIONING OF THE BOARD. THE RESULT OF THE EVALUATION IS SATISFACTORY AND ADEQUATE AND MEETS THE REQUIREMENT OF THE COMPANY. |
PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF THE COMPANIES ACT, 2013 AND LISTING REGULATIONS, THE BOARD HAS CARRIED OUT AN ANNUAL PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF ITS OWN PERFORMANCE, THE DIRECTORS INDIVIDUALLY AS WELL AS THE EVALUATION OF THE WORKING OF ITS AUDIT COMMITTEE, NOMINATION AND REMUNERATION COMMITTEE. THE EVALUATION PROCESS COVERED THE ASPECTS WHICH INCLUDED BOARD STRUCTURE AND COMPOSITION, FREQUENCY OF BOARD MEETINGS, PARTICIPATION IN THE LONG TERM STRATEGIC PLANNING, CONTRIBUTION TO AND MONITORING OF CORPORATE GOVERNANCE PRACTICES AND THE FULFILMENT OF DIRECTORS’ OBLIGATION AND FIDUCIARY RESPONSIBILITIES, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ACTIVE PARTICIPATION AT THE BOARD AND COMMITTEE MEETINGS. THIS EVALUATION IS LED BY THE CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD GOVERNANCE, NOMINATION AND REMUNERATION COMMITTEE WITH SPECIFIC FOCUS ON THE PERFORMANCE AND EFFECTIVE FUNCTIONING OF THE BOARD. THE RESULT OF THE EVALUATION IS SATISFACTORY AND ADEQUATE AND MEETS THE REQUIREMENT OF THE COMPANY. |
PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF THE COMPANIES ACT, 2013 AND LISTING REGULATIONS, THE BOARD HAS CARRIED OUT AN ANNUAL PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF ITS OWN PERFORMANCE, THE DIRECTORS INDIVIDUALLY AS WELL AS THE EVALUATION OF THE WORKING OF ITS AUDIT COMMITTEE, NOMINATION AND REMUNERATION COMMITTEE. THE EVALUATION PROCESS COVERED THE ASPECTS WHICH INCLUDED BOARD STRUCTURE AND COMPOSITION, FREQUENCY OF BOARD MEETINGS, PARTICIPATION IN THE LONG TERM STRATEGIC PLANNING, CONTRIBUTION TO AND MONITORING OF CORPORATE GOVERNANCE PRACTICES AND THE FULFILMENT OF DIRECTORS’ OBLIGATION AND FIDUCIARY RESPONSIBILITIES, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ACTIVE PARTICIPATION AT THE BOARD AND COMMITTEE MEETINGS. THIS EVALUATION IS LED BY THE CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD GOVERNANCE, NOMINATION AND REMUNERATION COMMITTEE WITH SPECIFIC FOCUS ON THE PERFORMANCE AND EFFECTIVE FUNCTIONING OF THE BOARD. THE RESULT OF THE EVALUATION IS SATISFACTORY AND ADEQUATE AND MEETS THE REQUIREMENT OF THE COMPANY. |
PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF THE COMPANIES ACT, 2013 AND LISTING REGULATIONS, THE BOARD HAS CARRIED OUT AN ANNUAL PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF ITS OWN PERFORMANCE, THE DIRECTORS INDIVIDUALLY AS WELL AS THE EVALUATION OF THE WORKING OF ITS AUDIT COMMITTEE, NOMINATION AND REMUNERATION COMMITTEE. THE EVALUATION PROCESS COVERED THE ASPECTS WHICH INCLUDED BOARD STRUCTURE AND COMPOSITION, FREQUENCY OF BOARD MEETINGS, PARTICIPATION IN THE LONG TERM STRATEGIC PLANNING, CONTRIBUTION TO AND MONITORING OF CORPORATE GOVERNANCE PRACTICES AND THE FULFILMENT OF DIRECTORS’ OBLIGATION AND FIDUCIARY RESPONSIBILITIES, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ACTIVE PARTICIPATION AT THE BOARD AND COMMITTEE MEETINGS. THIS EVALUATION IS LED BY THE CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD GOVERNANCE, NOMINATION AND REMUNERATION COMMITTEE WITH SPECIFIC FOCUS ON THE PERFORMANCE AND EFFECTIVE FUNCTIONING OF THE BOARD. THE RESULT OF THE EVALUATION IS SATISFACTORY AND ADEQUATE AND MEETS THE REQUIREMENT OF THE COMPANY. |
PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF THE COMPANIES ACT, 2013 AND LISTING REGULATIONS, THE BOARD HAS CARRIED OUT AN ANNUAL PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF ITS OWN PERFORMANCE, THE DIRECTORS INDIVIDUALLY AS WELL AS THE EVALUATION OF THE WORKING OF ITS AUDIT COMMITTEE, NOMINATION AND REMUNERATION COMMITTEE. THE EVALUATION PROCESS COVERED THE ASPECTS WHICH INCLUDED BOARD STRUCTURE AND COMPOSITION, FREQUENCY OF BOARD MEETINGS, PARTICIPATION IN THE LONG TERM STRATEGIC PLANNING, CONTRIBUTION TO AND MONITORING OF CORPORATE GOVERNANCE PRACTICES AND THE FULFILMENT OF DIRECTORS’ OBLIGATION AND FIDUCIARY RESPONSIBILITIES, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ACTIVE PARTICIPATION AT THE BOARD AND COMMITTEE MEETINGS. THIS EVALUATION IS LED BY THE CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD GOVERNANCE, NOMINATION AND REMUNERATION COMMITTEE WITH SPECIFIC FOCUS ON THE PERFORMANCE AND EFFECTIVE FUNCTIONING OF THE BOARD. THE RESULT OF THE EVALUATION IS SATISFACTORY AND ADEQUATE AND MEETS THE REQUIREMENT OF THE COMPANY. |
PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF THE COMPANIES ACT, 2013 AND LISTING REGULATIONS, THE BOARD HAS CARRIED OUT AN ANNUAL PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF ITS OWN PERFORMANCE, THE DIRECTORS INDIVIDUALLY AS WELL AS THE EVALUATION OF THE WORKING OF ITS AUDIT COMMITTEE, NOMINATION AND REMUNERATION COMMITTEE. THE EVALUATION PROCESS COVERED THE ASPECTS WHICH INCLUDED BOARD STRUCTURE AND COMPOSITION, FREQUENCY OF BOARD MEETINGS, PARTICIPATION IN THE LONG TERM STRATEGIC PLANNING, CONTRIBUTION TO AND MONITORING OF CORPORATE GOVERNANCE PRACTICES AND THE FULFILMENT OF DIRECTORS’ OBLIGATION AND FIDUCIARY RESPONSIBILITIES, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ACTIVE PARTICIPATION AT THE BOARD AND COMMITTEE MEETINGS. THIS EVALUATION IS LED BY THE CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD GOVERNANCE, NOMINATION AND REMUNERATION COMMITTEE WITH SPECIFIC FOCUS ON THE PERFORMANCE AND EFFECTIVE FUNCTIONING OF THE BOARD. THE RESULT OF THE EVALUATION IS SATISFACTORY AND ADEQUATE AND MEETS THE REQUIREMENT OF THE COMPANY. |