| PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF THE COMPANIES ACT, 2013 AND IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF SEBI (LISTING OBLIGATIONS AND DISCLOSURE REQUIREMENTS) REGULATIONS, 2015, THE BOARD HAS CARRIED OUT THE ANNUAL PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF ITS OWN PERFORMANCE, THE DIRECTORS INDIVIDUALLY AS WELL AS THE EVALUATION OF THE WORKING OF ITS COMMITTEES. A STRUCTURED QUESTIONNAIRE WAS PREPARED AFTER TAKING INTO CONSIDERATION INPUTS RECEIVED FROM THE DIRECTORS, COVERING VARIOUS ASPECTS OF THE BOARD’S FUNCTIONING SUCH AS ADEQUACY OF THE COMPOSITION OF THE BOARD AND ITS COMMITTEES, BOARD CULTURE, EXECUTION AND PERFORMANCE OF SPECIFIC DUTIES, OBLIGATIONS AND GOVERNANCE.A SEPARATE EXERCISE WAS CARRIED OUT TO EVALUATE THE PERFORMANCE OF INDIVIDUAL DIRECTORS INCLUDING THE CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD, WHO WERE EVALUATED ON PARAMETERS SUCH AS LEVEL OF ENGAGEMENT AND CONTRIBUTION, INDEPENDENCE OF JUDGEMENT, SAFEGUARDING THE INTEREST OF THE COMPANY AND ITS MINORITY SHAREHOLDERS ETC. THE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF THE INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS WAS CARRIED OUT BY THE ENTIRE BOARD. THE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF THE CHAIRMAN AND THE NON INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS WAS CARRIED OUT BY THE INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS WHO ALSO REVIEWED THE PERFORMANCE OF THE KEY MANAGERIAL PERSONNEL. THE DIRECTORS EXPRESSED THEIR SATISFACTION WITH THE EVALUATION PROCESS. |
| PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF THE COMPANIES ACT, 2013 AND IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF SEBI (LISTING OBLIGATIONS AND DISCLOSURE REQUIREMENTS) REGULATIONS, 2015, THE BOARD HAS CARRIED OUT THE ANNUAL PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF ITS OWN PERFORMANCE, THE DIRECTORS INDIVIDUALLY AS WELL AS THE EVALUATION OF THE WORKING OF ITS COMMITTEES. A STRUCTURED QUESTIONNAIRE WAS PREPARED AFTER TAKING INTO CONSIDERATION INPUTS RECEIVED FROM THE DIRECTORS, COVERING VARIOUS ASPECTS OF THE BOARD’S FUNCTIONING SUCH AS ADEQUACY OF THE COMPOSITION OF THE BOARD AND ITS COMMITTEES, BOARD CULTURE, EXECUTION AND PERFORMANCE OF SPECIFIC DUTIES, OBLIGATIONS AND GOVERNANCE. A SEPARATE EXERCISE WAS CARRIED OUT TO EVALUATE THE PERFORMANCE OF INDIVIDUAL DIRECTORS INCLUDING THE CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD, WHO WERE EVALUATED ON PARAMETERS SUCH AS LEVEL OF ENGAGEMENT AND CONTRIBUTION, INDEPENDENCE OF JUDGEMENT, SAFEGUARDING THE INTEREST OF THE COMPANY AND ITS MINORITY SHAREHOLDERS ETC. THE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF THE INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS WAS CARRIED OUT BY THE ENTIRE BOARD. THE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF THE CHAIRMAN AND THE NON INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS WAS CARRIED OUT BY THE INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS WHO ALSO REVIEWED THE PERFORMANCE OF THE KEY MANAGERIAL PERSONNEL. THE DIRECTORS EXPRESSED THEIR SATISFACTION WITH THE EVALUATION PROCESS. |
| PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF THE COMPANIES ACT, 2013 AND IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF SEBI (LISTING OBLIGATIONS AND DISCLOSURE REQUIREMENTS) REGULATIONS, 2015, THE BOARD HAS CARRIED OUT THE ANNUAL PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF ITS OWN PERFORMANCE, THE DIRECTORS INDIVIDUALLY AS WELL AS THE EVALUATION OF THE WORKING OF ITS COMMITTEES. A STRUCTURED QUESTIONNAIRE WAS PREPARED AFTER TAKING INTO CONSIDERATION INPUTS RECEIVED FROM THE DIRECTORS, COVERING VARIOUS ASPECTS OF THE BOARD’S FUNCTIONING SUCH AS ADEQUACY OF THE COMPOSITION OF THE BOARD AND ITS COMMITTEES, BOARD CULTURE, EXECUTION AND PERFORMANCE OF SPECIFIC DUTIES, OBLIGATIONS AND GOVERNANCE. A SEPARATE EXERCISE WAS CARRIED OUT TO EVALUATE THE PERFORMANCE OF INDIVIDUAL DIRECTORS INCLUDING THE CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD, WHO WERE EVALUATED ON PARAMETERS SUCH AS LEVEL OF ENGAGEMENT AND CONTRIBUTION, INDEPENDENCE OF JUDGEMENT, SAFEGUARDING THE INTEREST OF THE COMPANY AND ITS MINORITY SHAREHOLDERS ETC. THE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF THE INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS WAS CARRIED OUT BY THE ENTIRE BOARD. THE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF THE CHAIRMAN AND THE NON-INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS WAS CARRIED OUT BY THE INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS WHO ALSO REVIEWED THE PERFORMANCE OF THE KEY MANAGERIAL PERSONNELS OF THE COMPANY. THE DIRECTORS EXPRESSED THEIR SATISFACTION WITH THE EVALUATION PROCESS |
| PURSUANT TO THE CORPORATE GOVERNANCE REQUIREMENTS AS PRESCRIBED IN THE ACT AND THE SEBI LISTING REGULATIONS, THE ANNUAL EVALUATION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS, INDIVIDUAL DIRECTORS AND COMMITTEES WAS CONDUCTED. THE EXERCISE FOR EVALUATION WAS CARRIED OUT THROUGH A STRUCTURED QUESTIONNAIRE SPECIFICALLY DESIGNED FOR THE BOARD, COMMITTEES AND INDIVIDUAL DIRECTORS. THE BOARD’S FUNCTIONING WAS EVALUATED ON VARIOUS ASPECTS, INTER ALIA, INCLUDING ITS STRUCTURE, STRATEGIC DIRECTION, MEETING EFFECTIVENESS, STAKEHOLDER VALUE AND RESPONSIBILITY, PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT, INFORMATION MANAGEMENT, GOVERNANCE, COMPLIANCE AND OVERALL PERFORMANCE METRICS. THE DIRECTORS WERE EVALUATED ON ASPECTS SUCH AS STRATEGY, FUNCTION, ETHICS AND VALUES, TEAM PLAYER, SELF-DEVELOPMENT AND OTHER GENERAL CRITERIA. THE PERFORMANCE OF THE COMMITTEES WAS EVALUATED BY THE BOARD AFTER SEEKING INPUTS FROM THE COMMITTEE MEMBERS BASED ON CRITERIA. THE CRITERIA ARE BROADLY BASED IN LINE WITH THE GUIDANCE NOTE ON BOARD EVALUATION ISSUED BY THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA VIDE ITS CIRCULAR DATED 5TH JANUARY, 2017. IN A SEPARATE MEETING OF INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS, PERFORMANCE OF NON-INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS, THE BOARD AS A WHOLE AND THE CHAIRMAN OF THE COMPANY WAS EVALUATED, TAKING INTO ACCOUNT THE VIEWS OF OTHER DIRECTORS. THE DIRECTORS WERE SATISFIED WITH THE EVALUATION RESULTS, WHICH REFLECTED THE OVERALL FUNCTIONING OF THE BOARD AND ITS COMMITTEES. THE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF ALL THE INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS WAS DONE BY THE ENTIRE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE COMPANY, EXCLUDING THE INDEPENDENT DIRECTOR BEING EVALUATED. |
| PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF THE COMPANIES ACT, 2013 AND IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF SEBI (LISTING OBLIGATIONS AND DISCLOSURE REQUIREMENTS) REGULATIONS, 2015, THE BOARD HAS CARRIED OUT THE ANNUAL PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF ITS OWN PERFORMANCE, THE DIRECTORS INDIVIDUALLY AS WELL AS THE EVALUATION OF THE WORKING OF ITS COMMITTEES. A STRUCTURED QUESTIONNAIRE WAS PREPARED AFTER TAKING INTO CONSIDERATION INPUTS RECEIVED FROM THE DIRECTORS, COVERING VARIOUS ASPECTS OF THE BOARD’S FUNCTIONING SUCH AS ADEQUACY OF THE COMPOSITION OF THE BOARD AND ITS COMMITTEES, BOARD CULTURE, EXECUTION AND PERFORMANCE OF SPECIFIC DUTIES, OBLIGATIONS AND GOVERNANCE. A SEPARATE EXERCISE WAS CARRIED OUT TO EVALUATE THE PERFORMANCE OF INDIVIDUAL DIRECTORS INCLUDING THE CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD, WHO WERE EVALUATED ON PARAMETERS SUCH AS LEVEL OF ENGAGEMENT AND CONTRIBUTION, INDEPENDENCE OF JUDGEMENT, SAFEGUARDING THE INTEREST OF THE COMPANY AND ITS MINORITY SHAREHOLDERS ETC. THE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF THE INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS WAS CARRIED OUT BY THE ENTIRE BOARD. THE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF THE CHAIRMAN AND THE NON INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS WAS CARRIED OUT BY THE INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS WHO ALSO REVIEWED THE PERFORMANCE OF THE KEY MANAGERIAL PERSONNEL. THE DIRECTORS EXPRESSED THEIR SATISFACTION WITH THE EVALUATION PROCESS. |