| PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF THE COMPANIES ACT, 2013 AND REGULATION 17(10) OF SEBI (LISTING OBLIGATIONS AND DISCLOSURE REQUIREMENTS) REGULATIONS 2015, THE BOARD HAS CARRIED AN ANNUAL PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF ITS OWN PERFORMANCE, THE DIRECTORS INDIVIDUALLY AS WELL AS THE EVALUATION OF THE WORKING OF ITS AUDIT AND NOMINATION & REMUNERATION. THE EVALUATION WAS DONE IN FOLLOWING MANNER: EVALUATION OF EVALUATION BY CRITERIA EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS QUALIFICATION, EXPERIENCE, AVAILABILITY AND ATTENDANCE, INTEGRITY, COMMITMENT, GOVERNANCE, TRANSPARENCY, COMMUNICATION, BUSINESS LEADERSHIP, PEOPLE LEADERSHIP, INVESTOR RELATIONS INDEPENDENT DIRECTOR ALL OTHER BOARD MEMBERS QUALIFICATION, EXPERIENCE, AVAILABILITY AND ATTENDANCE, INTEGRITY, COMMITMENT, GOVERNANCE, INDEPENDENCE, COMMUNICATION, PREPAREDNESS, PARTICIPATION AND VALUE ADDITION CHAIRMAN (CUM MANAGING DIRECTOR) INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS QUALIFICATION, EXPERIENCE, AVAILABILITY AND ATTENDANCE, INTEGRITY, COMMITMENT, GOVERNANCE, IMPARTIALITY, COMMUNICATION, BUSINESS LEADERSHIP, PEOPLE LEADERSHIP AND MEETING CONDUCT COMMITTEES BOARD MEMBERS COMPOSITION, PROCESS AND DYNAMICS BOARD AS A WHOLE INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS COMPOSITION, PROCESS AND DYNAMICS |
| THE FORMAL ANNUAL EVALUATION OF THE PERFORMANCE OF THE BOARD AND THAT OF ITS COMMITTEES HAS BEEN CARRIED OUT THROUGH A STRUCTURED EVALUATION PROCESS COVERING VARIOUS ASPECTS OF THE BOARD'S FUNCTIONING SUCH AS THE BOARD STRUCTURE & COMPOSITION, EFFECTIVENESS OF THE BOARD PROCESS, INFORMATION FLOW D.T FUNCTIONING, QUALITY OF RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE BOARD AND THE MANAGEMENT, ESTABLISHMENT, AND DELINEATION OF THE RESPONSIBILITIES TO COMMITTEES ETC. |